Joshua Charlton vs Scott Jones Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Second Serve: Recently, Jones has a slightly higher success rate than Charlton on second serves, winning 45.68% compared to Charlton’s 43.87%. How does this affect the outcome? Players often win more matches when they excel in second serve performance.
• Return Game: Jones has been slightly superior to Charlton in winning points on opponents' second serves, with 45% compared to 44.34%. Conversely, Charlton edges out Jones in first serve return points, achieving 26.83% versus 26.22% for Jones.
• Under Pressure: On saving breakpoints, Charlton has a slight advantage, saving 54.88% compared to Jones' 53.62%—an important statistic for in-game predictions.
• Overall Performance: In the past year, Jones has a slightly better win ratio at 59.38% compared to Charlton’s 55.93%. This suggests that Jones might have an edge based on overall recent results.
• Surface Effectiveness: Jones excels on clay, winning 75% of matches, whereas Charlton performs best on grass with a 63% win rate. Could the surface influence the match outcome?
• Player Level: Jones has been slightly more successful at the Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K level, winning 61.29% of matches compared to Charlton’s 57.14%.
• Direct Encounters: Charlton has won their only contest, which was a close three-setter match. Does history favor Charlton?
• Pressure Situations: Charlton has been more successful in tie-breaks against Jones, winning the only one they played.
• Opponent Quality: Charlton has been competing against slightly higher-ranked opponents, average ranking 344.56 vs. Jones' 356.31.
• Deciding Sets: Charlton shows a higher success rate in deciding sets, winning 63% compared to Jones’ 44%. Will this be decisive if the match goes the distance?
• Breakpoint Conversion: Jones significantly outperforms Charlton in this area, converting 41.67% of breakpoints compared to 28.18%. This could be crucial in pivotal moments.

Editorial Prediction (September 17, 2025, UTC):

Recent statistics suggest that Jones has a slight advantage in several areas, most notably in second serve performance and breakpoint conversion. These are critical aspects that can influence the outcome of a match.

Jones also has a marginally better winning percentage over the past year across the competitions they have entered, though Charlton has been up against slightly stronger opposition on average.

In their head-to-head history, Charlton has the upper hand, having won their sole encounter. Additionally, Charlton shows greater proficiency in high-pressure situations, such as deciding sets and tiebreaks.

While both players have distinct strengths, based on current data, Charlton appears to be the more likely victor due to their success under pressure and past head-to-head performance.